Sound Usb Driver Ubuntu LinuxSound Blaster X Fi Wikipedia. Sound Blaster X Fi Xtreme. KcKccjF-rog/hqdefault.jpg' alt='3D Sound Usb Driver Ubuntu' title='3D Sound Usb Driver Ubuntu' />Gamer Fatal. Pro. Sound Blaster X Fi is a lineup of sound cards in Creatives Sound Blaster series. HistoryeditThe series was launched in August 2. PCI sound cards, served as the introduction for their X Fi audio processing chip, with models ranging from Xtreme. Music lower end, to Platinum, Fatal. FPS, and Elite Pro top of the range. MB of dedicated memory found on the Fatal. Pro sound card via two Micron 4. LC3. 2M8. A2 7. 5 C PC1. SDRAM chips. The top end Elite Pro model was aimed at musicians, bundled with the X Fi external IO box offering phono with preamp inputs for turntables, high impedance input for guitars,  14 inch mic input, headphone output, line in, and full size MIDI IO, as well as optical and RCA Coaxial digital inputs and outputs, and remote control. The Platinum and Fatal. FPS models both offer a front panel drive bay control unit and remote control, while the base model was supplied without any such accessories. First steps Preparing for the Ubuntu Install. As before, prepare a bootable USB stick, but you can use the Ubuntu 15. Netbooks are often ridiculed as a solution looking for a problem but they are also regarded as the ancestors of present day Chromebooks and cloudbooks. With. All but the top model claimed 1. B signal to noise ratio, while the Elite Pro model uses a higher end DAC, with 1. B claimed. The bottom two models feature 2 MB standard RAM, while the top models offer 6. MB of X RAM,2 designed for use in games to store sound samples for improved gaming performance. October 2. 00. 6 saw a minor rebranding the X Fi Xtreme. Music edition, which was in fact a highly capable gaming card, as it offers hardware decoding and EAX support, was replaced with the Xtreme. Gamer model. The revised model featured half width PCB, non gold plated connectors, optical out instead of the digital out and digital IO module jack, and lacked the connector for users wishing to purchase a separate X Fi IO box. Functionality is otherwise the same. The market segment occupied by the Xtreme. Music was moved downwards, with the introduction of the cheaper Xtreme Audio and Xtreme Audio Notebook products, which, despite the X Fi label, are the only products in the X Fi line not using the EMU2. K1 chip CA2. 0K13 but an older chip similar to the Audigy SE and SB LiveCA0. WBTLF4 and thus lacking the hardware acceleration of 3. D sound and EAX sound effects, gaming and content creation features and the IO extensibility of all the other X Fi models. The other new product introduced was the X Fi Xtreme. Gamer Fatal. 1ty Pro, identical in function to the Fatal. FPS, but made more affordable by the unbundling of the IO panel and remote control. The 2. 0K1 chip can use a significant amount of RAM to store sound effects for faster and improved processing, just like the previous E mu 1. K series and E mu 8. This feature, dubbed X RAM by Creative and found on the higher end models in the X Fi line the Elite Pro, Fatal. Xtreme. Gamer Fatal. Pro Series, is claimed to offer quality improvement through audio processing capability enhancement, in addition to further reduction in host system CPU overhead. In 2. 00. 7 Consumer Electronics Show, Creative Technology unveiled PCI Express x. Express. Card3. 4 versions of Sound Blaster X Fi Xtreme Audio. Express. Card Sound Blaster X Fi for Notebooks 3. X Fi USB productseditIn addition to PCI and PCIe internal sound cards, Creative also released an external USB based solution named X Mod in November 2. X Fi lineup, but is only a stereo device, marketed to improve music playing from laptop computers, and with lower specifications of the internal offerings. Other external products that use X Fi name include USB based Sound Blaster X Fi HD, Sound Blaster X Fi Surround 5. Pro, and Sound Blaster X Fi Go Pro, their internal hardware components are different for various usages and needs for gaming, surround, or audiophile standards. X Fi featureseditThe audio processor on X Fi was the most powerful at its time of release, offering an extremely robust sample rate conversion SRC engine in addition to enhanced internal sound channel routing options and greater 3. D audio enhancement capabilities. A significant portion of the audio processing unit was devoted to this resampling engine. The SRC engine was far more capable than previous Creative sound card offerings, a limitation that had been a major thorn in Creatives side. Most digital audio is sampled at 4. Hz, a standard no doubt related to CD DA, while sound cards were often designed to process audio at 4. Hz. So, the 4. 4. Hz audio must be resampled to 4. Hz Creatives previous cards DSPs operated at 4. Hz for the audio DSP to be able to process and affect it. A poor resampling implementation introduces artifacts into the audio which can be heard, and measured as higher intermodulation distortion, within higher frequencies generally 1. Hz and up. 5 X Fis resampling engine produces a near lossless quality result, far exceeding any known audio card DSP available at the time of release. This functionality is used not only for simple audio playback, but for several other features of the card such as the Crystalizer, a technology that claims to improve the clarity of digital music through digital analysis supported by all X Fi models, including the Xtreme Audio and X Mod. The Sound Blaster X Fi presents the following features, which are usually implemented with the aid of the X Fi DSP or in software, in the Xtreme Audio model. Since its release X Fi has caused several unsolved problems with sound glitches on various motherboards. CrystalizereditCreative Labs states that the primary function of the Crystalizer is to restore portions of the sound which were lost during compression. The compression that is meant here is not the digital file size reduction achieved by digital audio data compression technologies like for example mp. Rather, the idea is to reverse the effects of dynamic range compression, an analog technique that was and is used during the production of most 1. Audio CDs with the exception of some classical music recordings to make them sound louder at the same volume level setting, as it was found that subjectively louder CDs get more airplay and sell better. To achieve this loudness without introducing strong distortion, points in the signal where the volume reaches a maximum are compressed which means in this case reduced in volume, then the whole signal is multiplied by a factor so that the maximum volume is reached again. After this, the music as a whole is louder than it was before, but the maximum volume points mostly transients are not as pronounced as they were before. Since this whole process is done before the final Audio CD is recorded, its effect is equally present in uncompressed audio files created from such a CD, in lossless compressed audio made from the CD, as well as in lossy compressed audio from that same CD. Transients are typically found in percussive sounds, in plosiveconsonants of voice recordings, and during the first few milliseconds the so called attack phase of non percussive instrument sounds. All these tend to be somewhat muffled by dynamic range compression. To undo this effect, the Crystalizer uses a multiband compander compressorexpander with dynamically adjusted compressionexpansion. Its main function is to detect transients and to increase their relative volume level. GPD Pocket Ubuntu Editon Review. Netbooks are often ridiculed as a solution looking for a problem but they are also regarded as the ancestors of present day Chromebooks and cloudbooks. With the resurgence of these more modern but still low performance devices, it might seem that the netbook is due for a revival as well. Or so that seems to be the proposition GPD makes with its almost literal Pocket computer. But does that make more sense now than it did before, especially in an age of powerful smartphones We take the Ubuntu Edition of the GPD Pocket for a good and thorough testing to find out. Crowdfunding Drama. Unlike the netbooks that broke into the scene a few years back, the GPD Pocket didnt arrive as a finished product. Like the GPD WIN before it, the Pocket is a product of crowdfunding, and a very successful one at that. GPD pitched the Pocket as its response to backers of the Windows based, gaming centric GPD WIN who appreciated the devices small form factor but wanted a better typing experience than what the clamshells thumb keyboard offers. GPD was only too happy to oblige with a slightly larger screen and a larger keyboard. Whether it was able to deliver a better typing experience is, however, debatable. But while the GPD is perhaps one of the most successfully funded campaigns on Indiegogo, its delivery wasnt as stellar. Units went out over a month late, and the Ubuntu Edition units even much later. But even before backers could get their hands on the fruits of their investment, they saw the device pop up on some online retailers, ending up in a situation where non backers are able to buy the GPD Pocket even before the backers. There has been no shortage of name calling, mud throwing, and even threats to call Indiegogo authorities but, eventually, most, but still not all, backers got their devices. The drama, however, doesnt end there, as well get to later. While GPDs behavior, which sometimes included periods of silence, was definitely not ideal, one cant discount the fact that crowdfunding always carries such risks. While a more established company, GPD is still a relatively small business operating in China. And despite the hiccups and bumps on the road, it was able to deliver for a second time. Hopefully they have learned their lessons already, if there will be a third. Design and Build. In its pitch, GPD compared the Pocket to the Mac. Book in terms of design, and it wasnt kidding. It might be a stretch to put it on the same level as a Mac. Book Air, but it definitely looks like a miniature Mac. Book. Unlike a Mac. Book, however, the GPD Pocket has no visible branding on its cover or even inside, something GPD promised and delivered to satisfaction. For a never before seen device coming from China that costs 5. The GPD WIN, which went on Indiegogo for 3. Given that context, its almost shocking that GPD was able to pull off the quality of design and build of the GPD Pocket. Much like the Mac. Book it was inspired from, the GPD Pockets body is all metal, giving it not just a sturdy structure but also some heft. At 4. 80 grams, this is no lightweight computer, but its not a flimsy one either. Despite its name, youll need very large pockets to slip in the GPD Pocket without looking ridiculous. At most, you can probably stow it away inside a jacket or coat pocket, but forget about tight jeans. At 1. 80 x 1. 06 x 1. Forgot about typing with your thumbs, however, or even using it safely while standing up. The overall design of the GPD Pocket is pleasantly clean. It has an industrial and utilitarian feel to it, much like a Mac. Book Pro. There are very few ports and holes on the GPD Pocket, and they are all happily located on the right side only. Download Adobe Pagemaker 7 Manual Pdf there. But while that does mean you wont have cables running out from both sides of the device, it also means that youll have to ensure your connects dont have overly wide connectors. Not that there are many ports anyway. You have, in order, a full sized USB 3. HDMI port, and a USB C port for both charging and data. Thats pretty much it. Noticeable is the lack of a micro. SD card slot, which is one of backers biggest complaint about the device. GPD believes that 1. GB is enough for this kind of device. At the end of those ports is a grille, not for the speakers, but for the Pockets always on, mostly audible fan. You might want to ensure those holes arent blocked at all times. Where are the speakers, you ask Theyre actually behind the keyboard, hiding in between the keyboard and the display hinge. Just as amusing is the microphone location, which is hidden underneath the spacebar. Specs. The GPD Pocket is labeled, derisively or otherwise, as a netbook because of two things its diminutive size and is matching diminutive specs. The Pocket runs on an Intel Atom x. Z8. 75. 0, the highest model of the now deprecated processor series. The choice of processor isnt exactly surprising, though still a bit disappointing. Despite having been practically abandoned by Intel, the Atom CPUs are still the most easily available and affordable low power, fanless So. C small OEMs like GPD can put inside a mobile PC. The difference between an Atom and, say, a Core M in price and power consumption is just too great. Sadly, the choice of the processor does severely limit some of the other hardware GPD can use. For example, that 1. GB of storage is of the slower and older e. MMC type, not SSD as some might expect. Amusingly, while the Intel Atom is commonly adopted because of its fanless design, GPD opted to still use a fan in order to push the processor to its full capacity, with rather mixed results. The rest of the GPD Pockets specs, however, are rather impressive. It has 8 GB of RAM, which is quite rare for small form devices such as this. It definitely helps in the multi tasking part of its performance, truly marking the mini computer as a productivity device. Just as impressive is the screen, a bright and vibrant 7 inch panel with a resolution of 1. Most screens of this size usually default to 7. Full HD tend to be more expensive. As a point of interest, the screen is actually designed for tablets meant to be used in portrait mode, which is why the display defaults to that orientation. Its not all roses, however. As mentioned, there is no storage expansion option on the Pocket, forcing users to plug in a USB flash or hard drive as the need arises. There is also no built in 4. G mode, which is becoming more common on laptops. That, however, would require far more costs and certifications than both GPD and its buyers might care to pay for. And finally, the 7,0. Ah battery is advertised to give 1. Performance and Battery Life. That all looks great on paper and in photos, but the big question is whether it translates into the real world. This, unfortunately, is when the dream starts to break down a bit. The situation isnt clear cut, however, especially without a more or less standard benchmarking tool for Linux like you would find for mobile or Windows. Truth be told, the Intel Atom processor is largely underestimated. Throw in 8 GB of RAM and an active cooling system and you have the makings of a rather potent portable PC. Multiple browser tabs are no problem and so are multiple open applications. No, processing power isnt your enemy here. Need For Speed Apk there. Thermal throttling and management is. The Intel Atom isnt meant to be taxed to much, and, when it does, it crashes down hard. GPD applies a rather low thermal limit but when all cores are utilized and temperatures reach around 6.